I’ve been vetting potential partners for our referral program, and I keep getting stuck on the same problem: how do I know if someone is actually ready to handle bigger deals before I commit real client work to them?
I look at portfolios, case studies, testimonials—all the standard stuff. And sure, some people have impressive work. But that doesn’t tell me whether they can:
- Deliver consistently when we actually work together
- Handle a difficult client conversation
- Meet tight deadlines without drama
- Admit when they’ve made a mistake
- Scale their work without losing quality
I’ve had partners with great portfolios completely fall apart when we gave them their first real brief. And I’ve had partners with modest portfolios who turned out to be incredibly reliable and easy to work with.
So lately I’ve been trying to figure out what I’m actually looking for. I’ve done small test projects with some people—small enough that if it goes wrong, it doesn’t hurt. And that’s helped. But it’s also inefficient. I can’t test everyone before giving them real work.
I’m wondering if there are questions I should be asking, or signals I should be looking for, that actually predict whether someone will be a good partner at scale. Or if the test project approach is just… the way it has to be.
How do you vet partners before you actually work with them? Are you looking at something I’m missing? And how much of your vetting process is just… gut feel?
Real talk: a lot of it is gut feel. But there are some patterns I’ve learned to look for.
The portfolio tells you what they can do. But here’s what actually signals readiness:
-
Communication responsiveness - How fast do they reply to initial inquiry emails? If it takes them a week, that’s a sign they’re either not organized or not interested in growth. I expect a response within 24 hours.
-
Specific questions about your needs - When you describe what you’re looking for, do they immediately pitch what they do? Or do they ask clarifying questions about your problem? Partners who ask questions are partners who think.
-
Honesty about limitations - This is huge. If you ask “Can you deliver 50 pieces in two weeks?” and they immediately say YES without asking what kind of pieces or what your quality bar is, they’re overcommitting. I like partners who say “Maybe—tell me more about the scope.”
-
References that go deeper - Don’t just ask “would you work with them again?” Ask: “Tell me about a time things got difficult. How did they handle it?” The answer to that question tells you everything.
-
Pricing that makes sense - If their rate is way below market or way above, that’s a red flag. Below = they’re desperate or struggling to survive. Above = they might not be incentivized to be reliable.
The test project is still my gold standard, but I do smaller ones now. Instead of a full campaign, I give them one specific deliverable—one UGC video, one brief analysis, whatever. I watch how they ask clarifying questions, how they handle feedback, when they actually ship it.
One more thing: I always ask partners about their team. If everything relies on one person, they’re not scalable.
Oh, and one thing I learned the hard way—track how many revisions they ask for on that first test project. Partners who ask for unlimited revisions are partners who won’t ship on time when you’re paying them. They’re scared of commitment.
Good partners ask clarifying questions upfront, deliver something close to what you want, and want to move forward. Bad partners ask for endless feedback loops.
From a creator perspective, I think there’s something people miss when vetting—do they actually understand the platform or niche we create for?
I’ve worked with agencies that had amazing portfolios, but they clearly didn’t get TikTok, or Instagram, or YouTube. They’d brief me with traditional advertising language and get confused when I tried to tell them what actually performs.
When I’m pitching to an agency or brand, I show them that I get it—I show them my audience stats, engagement patterns, what kind of content my followers engage with. Not just “here’s some pretty videos I made.”
So when you’re vetting someone, ask them to show you their metrics on their own work. If they can’t articulate why something performed well, they just got lucky last time.