How are you actually landing US brand deals when your network is basically zero?

I’m a creator with decent followings in both RU and US markets, but here’s the thing—my network of actual brand contacts is basically nonexistent. I can create solid content, my engagement rates are respectable, but when it comes to actually pitching to US brands or getting them to come to me, I hit a wall.

I’ve been doing cold outreach the traditional way (LinkedIn, email), and the response rate is… not great. I’m wondering how other creators in this bilingual space are actually breaking through. Are you leveraging connections from the Russian side to build credibility with US brands? Are you using referrals differently? Or is there something about how you’re positioning yourself that actually gets US brand decision-makers to take you seriously?

I’m not looking for shortcuts—I get that you earn trust over time. But I’m curious what the actual mechanics are. Do you have a specific system for identifying brands worth pitching to? Are you focusing on smaller brands first to build case studies, or going straight for the bigger names? What’s working for you right now?

Oh, this is such a great question! Honestly, the best deals I’ve seen come through actual introductions, not cold pitches. Here’s what I’ve noticed: creators who are active in both communities—showing up in Russian creator circles AND engaging with US influencer content—naturally build a network on both sides.

One thing that’s changed the game for me is helping creators see their Russian audience as an asset to US brands, not a liability. Like, if you can show a brand “I have 50k engaged Russians + 30k US followers, and I understand both markets,” that’s actually unique positioning. A lot of US brands are trying to expand globally but don’t have that insight.

Also—and this might sound simple—but genuine relationship-building works. Comment thoughtfully on other creators’ posts, engage with brand content you actually care about, not just the ones you want to pitch. People notice. Those relationships turn into introductions eventually.

What’s your current positioning when you do reach out? Are you leading with “bilingual creator” or are you pitching yourself differently to US vs RU brands?

I want to add something too—have you thought about working with micro-brands or DTC companies first? They’re usually more open to creator partnerships because they have smaller teams and move faster. Once you have a few solid case studies from real US brands, the bigger ones become way easier to approach.

Also, there’s real power in connecting other creators if they’re a good fit. Like, if you meet a US creator who’d be perfect for a brand you know, introduce them. Build that reciprocal relationship. People remember who helped them, and suddenly your network grows organically.

Data perspective here: the cold outreach response rate issue is real, and it’s not just you. Industry-wide, cold Creator pitches to brands get maybe 2-5% response rates. But when you come through a warm introduction? That jumps to 30-40%.

What I’d track if I were in your position: which pitch got responses? What was different about them? Was it the brand type, your positioning, the timing? Create a small dataset from your outreach attempts—not huge numbers, just 10-15 pitches—and analyze what actually worked.

Also, consider this metric: time-to-response. If a brand takes 3+ weeks to respond to a cold pitch, they’re probably not moving fast anyway. Focus on brands that respond quickly, even if it’s “not right now.” That’s a signal they’re actively reviewing partnerships.

Your bilingual positioning should be quantifiable. Do you have engagement rates broken down by market? Does your US audience engage differently than your RU audience? That data is gold for brands considering market expansion.

I’m dealing with this from the brand side now, and I can tell you what actually catches my attention when I’m looking at creator partners. It’s not always the biggest follower count.

What matters: (1) Does the creator actually understand what we’re trying to do? Like, a pitch that shows you’ve researched our brand and thought about our specific goals beats a generic template every time. (2) Can they demonstrate results? Not just “my engagement is high” but “when I posted about X category, my audience bought from 3 similar brands.” (3) Are they professional? No late responses, clear contracts, organized communication. That stuff stands out.

For US brands specifically, many of them are skeptical about partnerships with creators they don’t know. They want either a referral (someone they trust vouches for you) or a track record. Start with one good deal, document it well, use it as your stepping stone.

Are you currently tracking and sharing your results with potential brand partners, or are you just pitching based on follower count?

Cold outreach isn’t dead, but it’s evolved. Here’s what works in 2024:

First—don’t pitch directly to brands initially. Find the brands’ agency partners or marketing consultants. That’s one degree of separation that actually exists and gets responded to. If a brand works with an agency, the agency is constantly looking for creator partnerships. Position yourself to agencies first.

Second—relevance over volume. Instead of pitching 50 brands, research 5 brands deeply. Show you understand their product, their target customer, their recent campaigns. Then pitch. Your response rate will skyrocket.

Third—create assets that prove your value. Not just past work—create a one-pager that shows your two-market positioning. “I bridge Russian and US audiences” is marketing gold if you present it right. Brands looking to expand internationally eat that up.

I’ve seen creators go from “nobody’s responding” to “booking monthly retainers” by switching from spray-and-pray pitching to smarter, more targeted outreach. It takes more time per pitch, but the ROI is completely different.

One question: are you going after brands in categories you actually care about, or just any brand that might pay?

From a strategic standpoint, your network problem isn’t actually a network problem—it’s a positioning problem.

Here’s the framework I’d use: Most US brand decision-makers don’t go seeking creators cold. They either (a) get referred by someone they trust, (b) find you through existing networks (agencies, partner networks), or (c) discover you because you’re relevant to their current objectives.

You can’t control (a) immediately, but you can optimize for (b) and (c). For (b), which partner networks, affiliate programs, or agency relationships could you tap into? For (c), what’s your SEO strategy? Are you findable when brands search for your niche?

Also—and this matters—US brands think differently about creator value than Russian brands. They want attribution, trackable ROI, and professional communication. If your pitch materials, response time, and follow-up process don’t reflect that, it won’t matter how good your content is.

I’d recommend doing competitive analysis. Find 5 creators similar to you who ARE landing US brand deals. What’s different about their positioning, their content strategy, their pitch approach? What can you learn?

What does your current pitch deck/one-pager actually emphasize about your value?